Luxury Pool Plans Approved in Putney Conservation Area

Garden scheme gets go-ahead despite neighbour opposition

Luxury Pool Plans Approved in Putney Conservation Area
A visualisation submitted with the application of the pool house and pool

Participate

Planners Turn Down Infill Scheme on Putney Bridge Road

Luxury Homes Plan for Former Putney Flats Site

Noodle Bar Opens Despite Planning Permission Refusal

Former Nursery Set to Be Converted into Special Needs School

Controversial Sylvia Court Scheme Set for Rejection

Roehampton Residents Plan Protest Against Loss of Green Space

Outrage Over Plans to Convert Putney Cycle Shop Premises into a Flat

Sign up for our weekly Putney newsletter

Comment on this story on the

November 17, 2023

Plans have been approved for an L-shaped pool house and 11m (36ft) swimming pool in the garden of a neo-Georgian house near Putney Common, despite objections from a neighbour.

Wandsworth planners have given the go-ahead for the development in Longwood Drive, which also includes an outdoor kitchen and plant room, although it sits within the Westmead Conservation Area.

Nic Howard, of Surrey-based garden design company 'We Love Plants', said in the planning application on behalf of Peter and Samatha Mackey that "the aim is to create a practical and visually pleasing outdoor living space that blends seamlessly with the surrounding conservation area."

The 3.48m (11ft 5ins) pool house would be made of oak and featuring weather boarding, with a pitched roof matching the house. "We have taken great care to integrate the pool and building into the garden's layout without disrupting the adjacent tree from the neighbouring property. Creating a building within a conservation area requires a delicate balance of skill and respect for heritage. Our top priority is preserving the historic importance of the area," Mr Howard added.

But a report prepared for Wandsworth planners by council case officer Samuel Bradley says one comment received following a consultation with the property's neighbours issued a string of objections to the scheme.

The list of more than 20 points objecting to the application included:

• If permitted, the proposed development would set a precedent for similar developments
in the local area;
• The proposed development would be detrimental to the character of the Westmead
Conservation Area;
• The proposed development would result in overdevelopment of the rear garden;
• The proposed development would facilitate large scale, frequent entertaining of crowds and large gatherings;
• The proposed pool house is out of keeping with the character of the original
dwellinghouse;
• The proposed development would be visible from the street;
• The outlook from the adjacent property, No.16 Westmead, would be obstructed;
• Sunlight/daylight to the rear garden of the adjacent property, No.16 Westmead, would be obstructed.

Council officer Mr Bradley said in his report that during the assessment of the proposal, the initial plans were amended to reduce the pool house height by 0.5m (1ft 8ins).

He said the plans submitted, although adjacent to the shared boundary with the property at 16 Westmead Road, would not "appear incongruous or visually intrusive to an unacceptable degree".

He concluded: "It would not appear incongruous in the context of its setting and would be largely concealed from the public realm so as to cause no harm to the special character and appearance of the Westmead Conservation Area."

Mr Bradley also felt the pool was not likely to result in unacceptable levels of noise for a residential amenity space. He added that the replacement of three fruit trees with five pear trees would be welcomed.

In his report recently submitted to Wandsworth Council, Mr Bradley took a delegated officer's decision to give the plans the go-ahead.

Like Reading Articles Like This? Help Us Produce More

This site remains committed to providing local community news and public interest journalism.

Articles such as the one above are integral to what we do. We aim to feature as much as possible on local societies, charities based in the area, fundraising efforts by residents, community-based initiatives and even helping people find missing pets.

We've always done that and won't be changing, in fact we'd like to do more.

However, the readership that these stories generates is often below that needed to cover the cost of producing them. Our financial resources are limited and the local media environment is intensely competitive so there is a constraint on what we can do.

We are therefore asking our readers to consider offering financial support to these efforts. Any money given will help support community and public interest news and the expansion of our coverage in this area.

A suggested monthly payment is £8 but we would be grateful for any amount for instance if you think this site offers the equivalent value of a subscription to a daily printed newspaper you may wish to consider £20 per month. If neither of these amounts is suitable for you then contact info@neighbournet.com and we can set up an alternative. All payments are made through a secure web site.

One-off donations are also appreciated. Choose The Amount You Wish To Contribute.

If you do support us in this way we'd be interested to hear what kind of articles you would like to see more of on the site – send your suggestions to the editor.

For businesses we offer the chance to be a corporate sponsor of community content on the site. For £30 plus VAT per month you will be the designated sponsor of at least one article a month with your logo appearing if supplied. If there is a specific community group or initiative you'd like to support we can make sure your sponsorship is featured on related content for a one off payment of £50 plus VAT. All payments are made through a secure web site.