|
ISSUE: Development Proposals at Whitelands College SW15. |
|||
RESIDENTS WILLING TO SUPPORT REASONABLE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT AT WHITELANDS SW15 IF PLAYING FIELD CAN BE SAVED. Residents in the Sutherland Grove area of Putney are willing to support the recent planning application for the redevelopment of Whiteland's College, Sutherland Grove, Southfields if an acceptable solution can be found to the obliteration a playing field of approx. 3 acres within the 13.2 acre scheme. The substantial site, currently owned and occupied by the University of Surrey is to be redeveloped for housing in a joint venture between the university and Nicholson Estates to fund the relocation of the University facilities to Roehampton.
"We recognise London needs more houses and we are happy with the way the developers have suggested converting existing listed buildings to provide a range of housing including some affordable accommodation," says Catherine Sedgwick, secretary of the Sutherland Grove and Area Residents Association (SG&ARA) "The bulk of the developers profit, however, will be made from building on a green field, and we are dismayed at the loss of such an amenity - especially as the new St. Cecilia School, only 250 metres away in Sutherland Grove has already had its playing fields sold off for housing development." In view of the lack of sports grounds in the Borough and at St. Cecilia's school, it is felt that it is essential that the grounds be retained for public usage of some sort. Parking
is already an issue in the area with restricted parking zones in surrounding
streets coming into play in recent months. That the proposed development
includes the provision of only 300 car parking spaces for 400 units
is a huge concern. Even assuming that on average there will be 1 car
per home unit, there will be 100 cars with no allocated parking. Added
to this is the need for the provision of adequate visitors parking on
site, so as to alleviate the pressure from The area is already suffering from commuters parking in the area and parking spaces are becoming few and far between. Road rage incidents on adjoining streets are now becoming commonplace. The height of the proposed development on the field is also an issue, as the listed boundary wall that will remain around the site will not be a shield for the rather glaring modern design of the new development, which does not reflect the architecture of the conservation area at all. The volume of which will also lead to a loss of privacy for the residents adjoining the site. "Loft
extensions in Girdwood Road abutting the southern boundary of the site
are already being refused by Wandsworth Council because of 'bulk', so
proposed three story townhouses abutting these rear gardens should not
be acceptable either, " says Tim Fry, local resident. The development is proposed to be an 'open development' permeable to any pedestrian access (despite the listed walling around the entire site) and thus any subsequent security risks. The residents, primarily of Whitefield Close who will have an unprotected boundary, are concerned that this development will create a "through route" for persons intent on misdemeanors and increase the number of break-ins. Finally
and by no means the least of local concerns are centred on the effect
of the development on the wildlife in the area. The loss of this particular
green corridor between the commons will seriously decrease the birdlife
and other flora and fauna currently nurtured in this If you wish to give your opinions to the Planning Department you can email them Boroughplanner@wandsworth.gov.uk or you can email the residents group camille@clpr.freeserve.co.uk 31.03.2003 |