Mother Speaks Out About Council's 'Grim Mission' to Take Away Her Son

Routine visit to GP ended with former Wandsworth Councillor nearly losing her child

Related links

Lucy Allan

Lucy Allan's Posting on the Putney Forum

Former Wandsworth Councillor Lucy Allan has given a dramatic and frank response to recent press coverage of how her family came to be the subject of a Child Protection Investigation by her own Council.

In a posting on the discussion forum she gives her side of the story which resulted in her losing her Council seat and nearly losing her son. Her post comes just as it was announced record numbers of children are being taken into care by social services across the UK.

A consultation last year about a mild bout of depression with a locum GP at Chartfield Surgery where she had been registered for 16 years was meant to be routine. She was seen by a newly qualified locum, Katherine Mawer, who told her that she was going to refer her son to social services to see if he needed support. Miss Allen offered to bring her son to see her regular GP but this was refused

Unknown to Miss Allan, the locum telephoned Dr Peter Green who was Head of Safeguarding Children in Wandsworth.

Miss Allan says, 'The well meaning, cautious, young locum set about following Dr Green's advice. Over a period of two days, she wrote up increasingly more extreme accounts of our 10 minute consultation. Where I had said my son would know how I would feel because we were close she wrote: "she tells her son frequently she wants to die." I had said, when asked, that I could never take my life because I could not leave my son behind, she wrote: "if she were to kill herself she would take her son with her." She did not check her account with me at or tell me of her concerns - she later claimed (on the advice of Dr Green and the Medical Defence Union) that to tell me of the allegations would have put our son's life at risk. We were advised she had to make this alarming statement to protect herself from legal action for breach of confidentiality without consent.'

Dr Mawer's report account was sent to Wandsworth Council and Wandsworth NHS (where Miss Allan was a Non Executive Director). Later the allegations were sent to her son's school. Miss Allan and her husband were not told what the allegations were, they had no opportunity to challenge them. She was given a full psychiatric assessment by an NHS consultant who said she was mildly depressed and no risk to anyone including her son.

Nevertheless, the police were informed by which point Miss Allan and her husband realised something was seriously wrong. They say that Wandsworth Council refused to accept the evidence of Dr Lebus at Chartfield Surgery who is the Senior Partner responsible for child safeguarding and who had said her son was not at risk. She also says that her son's school had confirmed he was happy and thriving.

Miss Allan said, 'WBC would not be deterred; they were on a grim mission to prove emotional abuse of our son - the cause we found out later was my alleged severe mental illness (despite going about my life and work as I always had) and my husband's alleged inability to protect our son from risk of harm. No one at all met my husband, social workers didn't interview him - had they done so they would have found a loving reliable hands on dad involved in every aspect of his son's life.

'WBC even relied on an anonymous consultation with an 'expert' I had never met. The evidence that demonstrated our son's safety and well being was relegated to irrelevant - it was almost as if social workers believed there was a conspiracy of silence by everyone who had met us or knew us.'

The investigation that ensued was protracted and traumatic for the family and ironically led to a severe depressive disorder for Miss Allan which she had to seek private treatment for due to fears that asking for medical help through the NHS may have been used in evidence against her.

She says, 'We did not lose our son, but others in similar circumstances do because they do not have access to solicitors, private health and cannot speak out for themselves. There is an assumption of guilt. No one wants to help or support an accused "child abuser." Being wrongly accused of abusing your child publicly is an horrific accusation for any parent. Social Services seemed entirely unaware of the harmful impact of their actions on families. There is no redress. No apology was received despite an external complaints procedure recommending we should receive one.'

She believes that the system is being overwhelmed by well-meaning social workers convinced of every parents' guilt but missing out on real cases of child abuse like Baby P and Victoria Climbie. Miss Allan has asked other families who have similar experiences to get in touch with her, their local councillor or Justine Greening MP.

A spokesman for Wandsworth Council said:
"If a GP refers child protection concerns to us, we have a duty to investigate and would be rightly criticised if we did not. We completed our investigation in this case in 13 days and concluded no intervention was required. We refute these claims but in the interests of this family's privacy, we will be making no further comment."

5th March 2012