Putney MP Blasts Jacob Rees-Mogg Over Hammersmith Bridge Jibe

Leader of House blamed protracted closure on 'socialist Mayor & council'

Fleur Anderson MP quizzes Jacob Rees-Mogg in the House of Commons
Fleur Anderson MP quizzes Jacob Rees-Mogg in the House of Commons

Participate


Putney Shopworker Says Violence Towards Staff Worst Ever

MP Visits New Surgery Treatment Centre

Putney MP Calls for a New Clean Air Act

Putney MP To Trek 26 Miles for Alzheimer’s Society

Putney MP Runs For Local NHS Staff

Putney MP To Hold Boat Race Day Protest on River

Putney MP Makes Plea for Local Business on the Brink

Sign up for our weekly Putney newsletter

Comment on this story on the

Fleur Anderson, the MP for Putney has reacted angrily to what she described as a soundbite response from Jacob Rees-Mogg to her question in the House of Commons about Hammersmith Bridge.

She was raising the issue of the lack of progress from the government on funding the full reopening of Hammersmith Bridge. In response the Leader of the House attributed the failure to agree a plan to a ‘socialist Mayor & Council’.

Fleur Anderson’s question to Jacob Rees Mogg was, “I have asked the Leader of the House this question before, but I will ask it again. Hammersmith Bridge is still closed to vehicles, which is pouring between 500 and 4,000 extra vehicles a day into Putney, increasing congestion and air pollution.

"The £141 million bill to restore that historic suspension bridge is unaffordable for Hammersmith and Fulham Council and unaffordable for Transport for London; only the Government can now fund it. Will the Leader of the House make Government time available to debate the ownership and funding of all London’s bridges, so that we can get the capital city moving again?”

Jacob Rees-Mogg, Leader of the House, replied, “The hon. Lady is right to campaign for this, but wrong to focus on the Government. The Conservative candidate, Shaun Bailey, had a proposal for dealing with it really quickly and getting on with things, had he been elected. Unfortunately, a socialist Mayor and a socialist council cannot run a whelk stall, let alone keep bridges open.”

The exchange took place this Thursday (22 July) shortly after it was announced that the bridge would reopen for cyclists and pedestrians.

Fleur Anderson believes that congestion in Putney is unlikely to be significantly eased by there partial opening. She says that there are an additional 500 to 4,000 extra vehicles going through Putney every day since the closure of the bridge and that Putney High Street is one of the most polluted streets in the country and air quality is a huge issue for local residents.

Ms Anderson, “Hammersmith Bridge has been closed to vehicles for more than two years now and there is still no end in sight.

“The closure of the bridge has brought an additional 500 to 4000 cars through Putney each day and my constituents are breathing increasingly toxic air as a result.

“I am sick of this Government playing party political games with an issue that is affecting so many people’s lives.

“What Jacob Rees-Mogg said to the people of London today is that the Government do not care about your problems because you had the cheek to not vote Conservative.

“And that they value a good soundbite about socialism or a humorous comment about whelks more than they care about the air you breathe or the difficulty you have in getting to work or getting your children to school.

"I don't want more bluster or jibes - we're not in a debating society. This is real life and I want a solution to this problem now."

Like Reading Articles Like This? Help Us Produce More

This site remains committed to providing local community news and public interest journalism.

Articles such as the one above are integral to what we do. We aim to feature as much as possible on local societies, charities based in the area, fundraising efforts by residents, community-based initiatives and even helping people find missing pets.

We've always done that and won't be changing, in fact we'd like to do more.

However, the readership that these stories generates is often below that needed to cover the cost of producing them. Our financial resources are limited and the local media environment is intensely competitive so there is a constraint on what we can do.

We are therefore asking our readers to consider offering financial support to these efforts. Any money given will help support community and public interest news and the expansion of our coverage in this area.

A suggested monthly payment is £8 but we would be grateful for any amount for instance if you think this site offers the equivalent value of a subscription to a daily printed newspaper you may wish to consider £20 per month. If neither of these amounts is suitable for you then contact info@neighbournet.com and we can set up an alternative. All payments are made through a secure web site.

One-off donations are also appreciated. Choose The Amount You Wish To Contribute.

If you do support us in this way we'd be interested to hear what kind of articles you would like to see more of on the site – send your suggestions to the editor.

For businesses we offer the chance to be a corporate sponsor of community content on the site. For £30 plus VAT per month you will be the designated sponsor of at least one article a month with your logo appearing if supplied. If there is a specific community group or initiative you'd like to support we can make sure your sponsorship is featured on related content for a one off payment of £50 plus VAT. All payments are made through a secure web site.


July 23, 2021

Bookmark and Share